However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 14, 2018, around 02:08, the Defendant was in front of the “C” convenience store located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu B, and was requested by the superintendent E of the police box belonging to the Seoul Gangnam-gu Police Station, who called out after receiving a report of 112 who was under the influence of alcohol, to return home from the police box belonging to the police box belonging to the Seoul Gangnam-gu Police Station, and was in a beer cans on the ground, and the Defendant was “B” to the above E.

After referring to the bitch bitch bit, the bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bit, the above E was tightly shicked with the shoulder of the above E by hand, and used it as the hand floor of the above E.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] There is no person [the person who has been specially mitigated] in the basic area (six months to one year and six months) [the decision of sentencing] [the decision of sentencing is recognized and contradictory to the defendant], and there is only one fine long time, the circumstances of the crime in this case and the degree of the defendant's economic obstruction, the defendant's age, sexual behavior, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be considered in light of the various sentencing conditions shown in the trial process and records.