An application for remedy by an applicant for remedy shall be dismissed respectively.

From May 2005, the Defendant: (a) borrowed money from around November 2006 to the Sucheon-si (Sacheon-si); (b) around May 2008, to the Sucheon-si (hereinafter “ZY”); (c) around May 2008, to the Sucheon-si (hereinafter “AU”); (d) to the MaU-si (AU-si); (e) to the MaU-si (hereinafter “ACA”); (e) to the Mari-si (hereinafter “CE”); (e) to the Mari-si (hereinafter “A-si”); and (e) to the Mari-si (hereinafter “CE”); and (e) to the Mari-si (hereinafter “AU-si”); and (e) to the Mari-si (hereinafter “AU-si”); and (e) to the Mari-si (hereinafter “AU-si”); and (e) to the Mari-si (hereinafter “AU-si”); (e) to the 5th (5) to the Mari-si.

However, around January 2010, the Defendant, at the time of taking over the above “CC” massage procedure, had a debt equivalent to KRW 2.5 billion, such as investment principal, bonds, etc. to be repaid to equity right holders and bond holders of the massage procedure in which the Defendant had operated, and even if having borrowed money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to pay the interest and principal properly.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 30,00 from the corporate bank account (CG) in the name of CF, a borrowed account used by the Defendant on the same day from the victim, and acquired KRW 590,60,000,000 from seven victims in total 17 times from around that time to April 17, 2012 by the aforementioned method as shown in the attached crime list.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;