However, for one year from the date of confirmation of each judgment against the Defendants.

D around July 18, 2013, in order to operate the gambling place and look at the place to E, and E provided it to D under its own name by leasing F apartment 101, 3203, Songpa-gu Seoul. D installed facilities necessary for gambling in the above apartment in order to prevent noise on the apartment, such as twit, twit-type table, chairs, card, chips, and chips, and 200,000 won per day in return for employment as the head of the branch office.

D from July 28, 2013

7. From the time of March 31, 200, M, Q, and R employed as a chip "drawer" to look at H, I, J, and K heading L, and had M, N, and R play a chip "rawing" role to take the surrounding children into customers, and had P, Q, and R participate in gambling while playing the above chip "rawing" role, and had P, Q, M, V, W, and X participate in gambling while exchanging cash with chip, and then enabling a similar person to return two card "hicker" and two card "hicker" and deducted fee for 5% of the fee in cash after the exchange of gambling.

The Defendants, despite being aware that D and G opened gambling at the above date, at the above time, at the above place, knew that D and G opened gambling for the purpose of profit, aided and abetted the act of gambling such as D and G by guiding customers who participate in gambling and serving as a referring to a referring to a referring to a referring to a referring to the outside of the gambling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the suspect for HKI and D (third) by the prosecution;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning G;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of S, T, U,V, W, and X;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. Vehicles used by suspects who play a role in investigation reports;