However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant, from 2013 to 2014, operated an electronic commerce enterprise with the trade name of “F” at the office of Seocho-gu Seoul E-building 302, and purchased “Furur Business DVD products and software products” from a Chinese seller and conducted an electronic commerce business to sell them to Japan, etc.

On November 4, 2013, the Defendant sold e-mail to the victim H operating “G”, which is an online shopping mall, “when registering the use of goods and certifying the use of goods, the Defendant sells a regular butter and microfit so that a telephone can be certified on microfet.”

I would like to sell six kinds of goods from "G", such as "Furdoz 7 Homes DSP Bur and PPC Murg".

“On November 28, 2013, the victim sent to the victim an image file with the purport that “this product is purchased directly in microfrancing the Republic of Korea,” and sent to the victim a quotation issued in the name of microfranc (scing total) 3, receipt (Receet) 5, etc.

However, the defendant purchased the above products from a seller of the Chinese Internet shopping mall (IDI) that he became aware of the fact that the above products were not microfishing Appphishing Appphy, and the defendant did not verify whether the above products are actually microfyed, through objective data. The three copies of the above quotation sent to the victim as evidentiary data and five copies of the receipt were made false as if the defendant purchased the above products directly from microfying Apphy retail.

On December 13, 2013, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) concluded a contract for the supply of goods between the said FF and the said G, which the Defendant operated; and (c) supplied the goods from November 2013.

However, the price of the goods was paid from January 7, 2014, and the price was paid by the defendant's deception.