2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

A. The circumstances surrounding the instant accident are as follows.

On June 19, 2018, June 2018, 20:20:25, at the time of the accident, the Plaintiff’s insured vehicle CD of the Plaintiff’s insured vehicle, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle in the situation of road collision around the Seoul, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, stopped across the first and the second lanes of the three lanes of the road of this case, but changing the course into the second two lanes. While the two lanes of the road of this case changed from the third lanes to the second one of the three lanes of the road of this case, the lowerer in front of the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle and the right side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle paid the insurance money with a shock of the two thousands

B. The judgment of the first instance court judged the fault ratio of the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the Defendant’s vehicle as 50:50, and calculated the Plaintiff’s amount of reimbursement as KRW 912,500.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry and image of the facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, 4, and 5 (including branch numbers, if any)

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

가. 당사자들의 주장 1) 원고 피고 차량이 도로교통법 제19조 제3항에 정해진 진로변경상의 주의의무에 위반하여 이 사건 도로의 편도 3차로 중 3차로에서 2차로로 진로를 변경하다가 이 사건 사고가 발생하였으므로, 피고 차량의 과실 비율은 80% 이상이다. 2) 피고 원고 차량이 좌측 방향지시등을 켠 채로 이 사건 도로의 편도 3차로 중 1차로와 2차로 사이에 걸쳐서 정차하였으므로, 피고 차량이 이를 신뢰하고 이 사건 도로의 편도 3차로 중 3차로에서 2차로로 진로를 변경하다가 원고 차량이 갑작스럽게 2차로로 진로를 변경하여 진행함으로써 이 사건 사고가 발생하였으므로, 이 사건 사고는 전적으로 원고 차량의 과실로 발생한 것이다.

B. According to the images of the evidence A5 and 6, the driver of any motor vehicle in accordance with Article 19(3) of the Road Traffic Act shall pass the normal course of the other motor vehicle running in the direction to change the course of the motor vehicle.