【2016 Highest 373】 On December 29, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbance, such as committing a disturbance for about about 40 minutes in the restaurant run by the victim D (V, 57 years of age) located in Ulsan-gu C from around 13:00 to around 13:40 the same day.

【2016 order 1159】

1. Fraud and interference with business affairs;

A. On October 5, 2015, the Defendant was provided with alcohol and service equivalent to KRW 460,000,000 (including service charges of KRW 60,00,00) for the victim E, in the main point of “G operated by the victim E, Nam-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., in spite of no intent or ability to pay the drinking value.” In short, the Defendant was provided with the victim with alcohol and service equivalent to KRW 160,00,000 (including service charges of KRW 60,00,000) for the following reasons:

2) The Defendant who interfered with his duties requested the settlement of the drinking value at the time and place specified in the above paragraph (1) by the victim E;

As a result of the police’s report, the term “Seman Ma Mae Ma Mae Mae Ma,” repeateding the tables, and intending to see the victim’s face by drinking, thereby obstructing the victim’s main business by force by avoiding disturbance, i.e., e., “f., f., e., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f.,”

B. On March 27, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed a crime against the Victim H; (b) on March 27, 2016, at the “J” restaurant operated by the Victim H in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; (c) the Defendant, despite having no intent or ability to pay the price, he/she did so as to pay the price; and (d) ordered alcohol and meat as if he/she would pay the price; and (e) the Defendant was the victim, i.e., the victim, e., the sum of 6 persons who suffered from the damage, i.e.,