도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable;
2. The Defendant had a record of committing the same kind of crime several times, and committed a second offense without being aware that the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment due to drinking driving prior to the volume of one month from the date of the instant crime, and the Defendant tried to flee without cooperation with the investigation, etc. is disadvantageous to the Defendant.
On the other hand, the fact that the defendant, after escaping from the police station, voluntarily attends the police station, and that the defendant seems to repent and reflect the crime, is favorable to the defendant.
In addition, in full view of the motive, place and distance of driving without a license or driving, after committing the crime, other circumstances, Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, etc., the Defendant’s assertion is not acceptable on the grounds that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.