채무부존재확인
Attached Form
In relation to the traffic accident stated in the list, the plaintiff's damages caused by the defendant's injury to the defendant.
On November 23, 2019, around 14:20 minutes, the Plaintiff operated the Plaintiff’s vehicle in the vicinity of the building, and caused a traffic accident, such as a traffic accident (hereinafter “instant traffic accident”) as indicated in the separate sheet in contact with the Defendant’s left side of the Defendant’s vehicle that was made bypassing along the bypass route while the vehicle was bypassing at the intersection.
On November 25, 2019, the Defendant issued a medical certificate to the effect that the Defendant appears to need approximately two-day stability rates due to injuries, such as bruth, bruth, brudial, remote, brudial, and heart brudial, and the symptoms of both heart brudic forests.
[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap 1, 2, 3 evidence, and Eul 3 evidence, the plaintiff's claim summary of judgment as to the cause of claim as a whole, and the cause of claim as to the purport of the whole pleadings, the traffic accident in this case was very insignificant. According to the police station's confirmation source of the traffic accident, according to the police station's confirmation source, the traffic accident in this case is confirmed as an accident at a level that is highly likely to cause significant sports change (injury) to passengers. The defendant's injury cannot be recognized as causation with the traffic accident in this case. Thus, the plaintiff's obligation to pay damages due
Judgment
According to the evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, the instant traffic accident seems to be very insignificant and to have low probability of injury. However, according to the diagnosis certificate No. 3, the Defendant was diagnosed with salt, tensions, and tensions of sacrines that require two weeks of treatment after the instant traffic accident. However, it is insufficient to acknowledge that there is no proximate causal relation between the Defendant’s injury and injury despite the above diagnosis certificate, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
The Plaintiff’s injury caused by the instant traffic accident against the Defendant.