2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On June 28, 2013, the examiner of the Korean Intellectual Property Office (1) held that the invention claimed in the instant application had ordinary knowledge in the technical field to which the invention pertains (hereinafter “ordinary technician”).

(2) On August 1, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a request for the revocation of the foregoing decision of refusal with the Intellectual Property Tribunal No. 2013 Won5754 on the ground that the patent application in the instant case could easily be claimed from prior inventions 1 or 3.

3) On September 30, 2014, the Intellectual Property Tribunal dismissed the Plaintiff’s request for adjudication on the grounds that the nonobviousness of the instant invention is denied by prior inventions 2 and 3. B. The name of the Plaintiff’s invention (Evidence 2 and 4) filing date/application: claims (amended by February 22, 2012) 1) , 2. EGS (EGS: Enmpid Ga Gamoral Sympid Ga, Gamororororor 1 in the process of constructing the Posoral Posor’s Posoror 1 in the direction of the Posor 2nd Posor’s Posor and 3th Posor’s Posor Posor’s Posor and 4th Posor’s Posor’s Posor’s Posor’s Posor’s Posor.