If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. On November 6, 201, the Defendant interfered with his duties: (a) around 11:35, 201, the Defendant: (b) took a bath in the D restaurant run by the Victim C in Suwon-si B, and talked with a large voice, such as “the opening, spawn, spawn, A,” and thereby, interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force, by forcing the victim to see “the opening,” and allowing the customer to go with his/her happiness, and preventing him/her from entering the restaurant.

2. The Defendant damaged the property at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) above by inserting a copy of the entrance door door door to be taken from the restaurant operated by the victim C, the owner of the business, in hand, and destroying a glass window equivalent to 30,000 won at the market price of the victim’s ownership.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Damage photographs and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;