2. The judgment of the court below is against the defendant's depth while making a confession of all of the crimes of this case, the crime of this case is against the defendant's depth, the fact that the crime of this case is committed on one-time medication, and the defendant's family members want to take the defendant's wife, etc., in light of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, including the defendant's nine-time punishment for the same crime, or the defendant has a total of 14 times of criminal punishment including the nine-time punishment for the same crime, and in particular, immediately after the defendant was sentenced for two years and six months of imprisonment for the same crime and was released upon the expiration of the term of punishment, the defendant was delivered a penphone, and the defendant committed the crime of this case by administering a phiphonephone at 4 days of release, and the court below seems to have determined the sentence by taking into account the favorable circumstances favorable to the defendant in light of the sentencing of the same similar case. In addition, considering various circumstances, the sentencing of the court below is too inappropriate.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.