구상금
1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 589,953,192 as well as KRW 298,578,212 from February 19, 2008 to July 2, 2008.
1. In full view of the evidence evidence Nos. 1 through 5 of the judgment as to the cause of the claim and the purport of the entire pleadings, it is recognized that there are facts as to the cause of the claim and the changed cause of the claim. Therefore, the defendant
2. The defendant's assertion asserts that the plaintiff's claim has expired by prescription.
However, according to the above evidence, the plaintiff's claim of this case is acknowledged to have been filed for the extension of the prescription period of claim for indemnity based on the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2008Gahap28170 decided November 4, 2008, and it is evident in the record that the lawsuit of this case was filed on October 29, 2018 before the lapse of 10 years from the date the judgment became final and conclusive. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.
3. It is so decided as per Disposition by accepting the plaintiff's claim for conclusion.