특수강도등
All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.
The summary of the reasons for appeal is that the sentence (one year and six months of imprisonment, one year and one year of confiscation) imposed on the accused by the lower court is too unreasonable.
The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant is too uneasible and unfair.
Judgment
Based on the arguments in this case and the records, such as favorable circumstances, unfavorable circumstances, etc., the defendant's age character and behavior intelligence environment including the defendant's age character and behavior environment, motive means of crime, and circumstances after the crime, and the sentencing criteria of the Supreme Court sentencing committee, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too heavy or unreasonable.
All the arguments of the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit.
In conclusion, the appeal filed by the Defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure; however, ex officio pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the proviso of Article 42 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and Article 334 of the Criminal Act, “Article 334 of the Criminal Act,” as “Article 334(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act,” “Article 335 of the Criminal Act,” “Article 334 of the Criminal Act,” “Article 15 of the Criminal Act, and Article 25(2) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, each of the “13,27,500 won” as “13,247,500 won,” respectively, shall be corrected as “13,500 won,” respectively.