However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year.

During the process of drinking and drinking in the package of the trade name, the Defendants: (a) Defendant B had a good talk about Defendant A; (b) took a bath to Defendant A; and (c) Defendant B had a desire to educate Defendant A; and (d) made it out.

1. At around 02:10 on June 9, 2016, Defendant A expressed his desire to “I am on the front of the Madro 53-ro, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Madro Madro Madro Madro Madro Madro Madro,” and then, the victim B(the age of 63) went beyond the floor, resulting in an injury of the number of days of treatment days on the rear of the head.

2. Defendant B, at the same place as the time and time set forth in paragraph (1) and at the same place, the victim A (50 years of age) was put into a blusium and the treatment days cannot be known.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the suspect interrogation of each of the Defendants

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on standing photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the Defendants’ choice of punishment concerning criminal facts: each of the Defendants is subject to imprisonment under Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of suspended sentence: The criteria for sentencing reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommending sentence] general injury (the scope of recommending sentence] and the mitigated area (2-1 year) [special mitigation] under the decision not to punish the Defendants (special mitigation) and the records, such as the defendants’ age, occupation, character and conduct, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances:

- There are a lot of records of punishment for the same crime - the recognition and reflection of the crime, and the defendants have reached a mutual agreement.