If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

On May 5, 2015, at around 03:20, the Defendant, at around 03:20, discovered that he did not make a daily and drinking drinking at the main point of “C” located in the Dong-gu Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, and then calculated the defective drinking value, and then, up to 04:10 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s bar business by force for about 50 minutes, such as why the victim D (the age of 39) was wraped, why the said victim’s drinking value is unsatisfy, and why the victim’s bar business was humpted, and that the victim’s drinking business was humpted for about 50 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the statement statement made to D by the police;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;