Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

1. On June 12, 2013, the Defendant: (a) even though there was no fact that the Victim C stolens money in the Plaintiff’s new wall market at Won-dong, Won-si around the morning; (b) on the same day, the Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by engaging in a friencing her mothers on the job with 20 or more customers.

2. The Defendant, around June 2013, damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by talking the said horses at the home where the merchants gather, in front of the Fran tavern in the original city E, at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of each of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes to witness C, G and H (before the opening of a statement: I);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;