However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a personal construction business operator who has been awarded a subcontract for a mold construction work from a friendly construction company at the site of a new construction project in Gyeong-gu, Chungcheongnam-si.

On December 6, 2012, the Defendant entered the said new construction site with a visa for specific activities (E-7-1) on December 6, 2012, and employed 14 Chinese nationals, who are Chinese nationals (C and date of birth) from December 12, 2015 to January 26, 2016, who are unable to engage in job-seeking activities due to the expiration of the period of stay.

Accordingly, the defendant employed a person who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A foreigner's statement;

1. Accusation of an immigration offender;

1. A notice of decision on examining an immigration offender;

1. Application of the list of employed foreigners, written confirmation of employment, and statutes;

1. Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the relevant Act and Article 18 (3) of the Immigration Control Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. As for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the confession, reflection, and absence of records of the same kind of crime, the size of the crime in this case, and the sentencing of the same case should be taken into account.