1. On February 6, 2015, the Defendant would allow the Victim C to purchase money from the victim C to purchase the 1.5 million fake game machine in the amount of KRW 600,000,00, because of the direct production of the amusement machine program by telephone.

“The phrase was false.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to purchase the amusement machine so that the injured party can operate the amusement room.

The Defendant received from the injured party, namely, KRW 5 million from the Defendant’s seat, to the Defendant’s bank account (E) in the name of the Defendant, and received from that time the Defendant received KRW 41,50,000 from that time on March 19, 2015, in total, nine times as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached crime committed.

2. On May 6, 2015, the Defendant against the victim F is expected to install up to 15 days a 40-day amusement machine “the fireworks 5” on the face of KRW 30 million to the victim F in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G 9 Dong 323 around May 6, 2015.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant receives money from the injured party.

The victim did not have the intention or ability to install amusement equipment.

On May 8, 2015, the Defendant was issued KRW 30 million to the national bank account under the above D’s name from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the suspect against the accused (including F part of the statement);

1. Each police statement with respect to C and F;

1. Each statement of financial transaction information, statement of transaction by account, deposit without passbook, verification of details of each transaction, and reply to a request for provision of financial transaction information;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (or H telephone call for a witness);

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes [the scope of recommending punishment] basic area (from June to June), the degree of damage is relatively large.