beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.05.01 2015고정18

상해

Text

Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid, only 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is a taxi engineer and the victim A is a D security guard.

Defendant

B around 11:50 on December 25, 2014, around D's 11:50, the victim A (the age of 43) and the victim A were involved in a horse dispute in front of D's Cheongju-si E, Cheongju-si, and the victim was pushed down with flab with flab, and then was parked in the victim's flab with flab hand, and the victim was pushed down with flab with flab, and the victim was parked with flab with flab, etc. on the part of 1 ton of the cargo car parked with flab with flab, etc. of the victim's flab, and the victim was flabed with flab and flabed with flab with flab, the victim's flab with flab, the right side side of the mouth, the upper flaf with flab, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against A;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A written diagnosis of injury (the sequence 6 of evidence list);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of CCTV recording materials (Evidence No. 7);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. The portion not guilty under Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention in a workhouse;

1. The summary of the facts charged against Defendant A is as follows: (a) Defendant A assaulted the victim B at the same time and place as the above facts charged; (b) Defendant A carried the victim’s chest with her hand, carried the victim’s knife with her finger, carried the victim’s knife with her knife with her knife, her knife with her knife with her hand, and carried the victim’s knife with her knife with her hand, etc.; and (c) Defendant A

2. Determination

A. In a criminal trial, the recognition of a criminal fact is based on strict evidence with probative value, which leads a judge to a reasonable doubt, and the proof by the prosecutor does not sufficiently reach the degree of such conviction.