2. The fact that the defendant shows an attitude that all of the facts charged in the instant case is recognized and reflected, and that he supports alone among those difficult economic circumstances is favorable.

However, on February 22, 2012, the Defendant had a record of criminal punishment three times for violent crimes, and was sentenced to two years of probation on March 1, 2012 to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act at the Changwon District Court was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on March 1, 2012, which became final and conclusive on March 1, 2012, and committed each of the instant crimes without being aware of the fact during the suspension of execution. In particular, when the Defendant was investigated by the police due to the suspicion of injury to the victim D, it was deemed that the Defendant was under investigation by the police officer in order to conceal the past criminal records, by providing the police officer with personal information, and thus, did not seriously lack compliance consciousness, such as the nature of the crime, and there was no other serious lack of compliance consciousness. In addition, considering the motive and circumstance of each of the instant crimes, the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, and environment, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too excessive.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.