beta
(영문) 대구지방법원경주지원 2020.12.22 2020고단604

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 16, 2020, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) (the Defendant), around 07:19 on July 16, 2020, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.129% in the Modern distance near the 1388 in the city of Sejong-si, the Defendant was driving B a low-income motor vehicle at a speed of about 40 km in the speed of about 130 km in the city from Ulsan-si to the g

There are three-lane crossings, and at the same time, the traffic volume was high due to the time of attendance, so in such cases, there was a duty of care to safely operate the brakes and steering gear by accurately manipulating the front and rear left and accurately.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so, while driving scam in a state where normal driving is difficult due to an unscambling and a horse project, etc. while driving scam in a state where normal driving is difficult due to negligence by failing to properly operate the brake and steering wheel devices, and caused the part behind the Dracker car driven by the signal signal from the front side to the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, and caused the frocon portion of the FC car driven by E, which is driven by the signal signal to the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant driven the said car in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of drinking, and suffered injury to the victim, such as salt dump, tension, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks.

2. Around 07:19 on July 16, 2020, the Defendant driven B-low-water vehicle under the influence of alcohol with approximately 14km alcohol concentration of about 0.129% from the 14km section to the Mool-distance road located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-si, which is located in 1388.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court: