If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

No one may provide a game product for any purpose different from that of the game product classified by the Meeting of the Game Water Rating Board members, even though the Defendant was classified as a class of the game product, from July 2, 2017 to July 27, 2017, at the “C” game site operated by the Defendant in Ansan-si, the Defendant installed a 10,000-point game product at free will, each time, at the bottom of the game screen, with GOLD window at 10,000 points. The POINT score at the game was created at each time when the GOLD score at the end of the game and the POINT creative score at the end of the game were classified as a class that all ceases to exist, the Defendant provided an unspecified game product at the end of each game, and installed the 38-hour game product at the end of each of the above game, and provided an unspecified game product at the end of each of the game, and provided the 38-hour game product at the end of the game.

As a result, the Defendant provided game water different from the rating of the game water management committee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports (Attachment, etc. of response points as a result of enforcement support);

1. Article 45 of the relevant Act on criminal facts and Articles 45 subparagraph 4 and 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Promotion of the Alternative Game Industry (Selection of Penalty) concerning the punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.