국가유공자요건비해당결정취소
1. The decision that the Defendant rendered against the Plaintiff on August 6, 2014 constituted a non-conformity of the requirements for a person of distinguished service to the State shall be revoked.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On February 7, 2012, the Plaintiff entered the Army and served in the Army as a 3rd and 11st rank of the 2nd group of the 31st group of the 2nd group of the 2nd group of the 2nd group of the 31st group of the 1st group of the 2nd group of the 31st group of the 2nd group of the 1st group of the 201st group of the 201st group of the 2012. On September 5, 2012, the Plaintiff was diagnosed that it is necessary to conduct an inspection of the clibrity due to the anti-monthss on the left side of the RI due to the anti-monthlys on the left
As a result of the second inspection on October 24, 2013, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as a half-month malone in the left-hand slot (hereinafter “instant wounds”) and was discharged on November 6, 2013 from military service on the left-hand slot, and was discharged from military service on January 24, 2013, and received a half-month malone in the left-hand slot line on January 24, 2013.
나. 원고는 2013. 11. 20. 피고에게 2012. 4. 18. 무렵 연대전투단훈련을 받던 중 24:00 무렵 완전 군장 및 기관총을 소지하고 산에서 내려오다 계단에서 발을 헛디뎌 넘어지면서 왼쪽 무릎을 다쳤고(이하 ‘이 사건 제1차 사고’라 한다), 2012년 8월 초 국지도발훈련을 받던 중 산에서 넝쿨에 걸려 넘어져 다시 왼쪽 무릎을 다쳤다
(hereinafter referred to as “the second accident of this case”) and filed an application for registration of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State with respect to the instant difference.
Therefore, on August 6, 2014, the Defendant did not verify the objective reasons such as the medical record at the time of the first accident at the time of the instant first accident, and confirmed the records of diagnosis and operation conducted by a hospital at the military hospital and private hospital in September 2012 and the records of re-operationed in January 2014 after the maturity of the record, and it does not constitute the requirements for persons of distinguished service because it is difficult to recognize the difference in the instant case as wounded in the performance of duties or education and training directly related to the national defense and security, or the protection of the lives and property of the people, but it does not constitute the requirements for persons of distinguished service, since it is determined that the occurrence or aggravation of the relevant disease has considerable causal relations with the performance of official