However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 2013, the Defendant told the victim E introduced from the Defendant’s seat in Gwangju Dong-gu C Building 701 to “I would have a fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluor, through the

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any kind of relationship with the labor union members such as the chairperson of the car union, and there was no intention or ability to allow the victims to work on a motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 100 million won in cash from the victim on April 23, 2013.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim to take the property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the head of a Tong (E and Gwangju Bank);

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The sentence like the order shall be imposed in consideration of the following factors: (a) the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant; (b) the victim recognizes the crime; (c) the victim does not have the same criminal record; and (d) the defendant's age, sex, family environment, motive and circumstance of the crime; and (e) the circumstances after the crime, such as the circumstances after the crime, shall be considered.