2. The fact that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and reflected against the defendant, and the defendant's participation in the crime of this case is not much serious in engaging in duties such as money exchange and customer care, etc. as an employee, the circumstances favorable to the defendant should be considered.

However, it is necessary to strictly punish illegal game room business, such as the crime of this case, by promoting a speculative spirit of the general public and neglecting the home economy. Nevertheless, considering the following favorable circumstances, the lower court’s sentencing is reasonable, taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant was sentenced to a fine, taking into account the Defendant’s age, environment, character and conduct, motive and circumstance of the crime; and (b) other circumstances, which are conditions for sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case, including the circumstances after the crime, etc.

3. The appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal of this case is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.