명예훼손
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. On March 26, 2013, the summary of the facts charged is that at the D convenience store D located in Sacheon-si C, the Defendant: “F was inspected with the husband in the above convenience store E; F was a man who has a lot of male and female life; F was a victim of family destruction; F was a man who has a bad wind in the inside and outside of the Republic of Korea; I talked with the victim of the victim by openly insulting the victim; and I, the above Schlage operator in Sacheon-si G continuously gave money to F and winding to F, and gave a good credit; and I, the husband, who was released from the Republic of Korea, had a large number of family destruction to the victim.”
2. The grounds for dismissing the prosecution of this case are the crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only upon a complaint filed by the victim under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. On November 20, 2014, the victim F, after the institution of the prosecution of this case, can be recognized as having been present in this court as a witness and having cancelled the complaint against the defendant. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed under Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.