2. The judgment of the court below is acknowledged that the defendant led to the confession and reflect of each of the crimes of this case, the vehicle of this case is covered by a comprehensive insurance and deposited KRW 3 million for the victim F. Meanwhile, each of the crimes of this case is deemed to have suffered an injury by four victims who operated the cargo in the condition of 0.182% of the blood alcohol concentration while driving the cargo under the condition of 0.182% of the blood alcohol concentration, and the defendant was faced with the entrance of the restaurant, and there is significant crime quality in light of the degree of the main crime and the number of the victims. The degree of the injury suffered by the victim was more than three times, and the degree of the injury suffered by the victim was more serious, and the victim was not agreed with the victims, and considering all the sentencing conditions such as the victim's age, character and behavior, circumstances after the crime, risk of recidivism, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.