When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2014. 4. 26. 02:45경 경기 광명시 B에 있는 'C' 앞 택시 승강장에서 D과 시비를 벌이던 중 신고를 받고 출동한 광명경찰서 E지구대 소속경찰관 F, G으로부터 사건 경위를 질문받고 임의동행 여부를 문의받자 화가 나 위 F의 멱살을 잡아 넘어뜨린 후 발로 배 부분을 1회 걷어차고, 이를 제지하던 G의 팔을 잡아 흔들고 발로 위 G의 팔을 수 회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police officer with respect to G and F, 1, and D;

1. An investigation report (to hear statements of witnesses);

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order reflects the defendant's wrongness, and there is no same criminal records, and the defendant's refusal to voluntarily conduct the police officer's request while making a correction while refusing to do so under the influence of alcohol and led to the crime of this case, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relation, and the degree of assault committed by the defendant shall be determined as per the order, taking into account all the conditions of sentencing as shown