상해
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds of appeal (the factual error) is the fact that the victim D, who met the defendant, fluened with the dog and the dog in which the defendant is kid, said D, by avoiding the disturbance of the defendant, and said D as blusing the victim's left blus, and did not inflict an injury on the victim by pushing the victim's chest or bluing the right arms as stated in the judgment of the court below.
Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous in mistake.
2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the defendant's assertion is without merit, since it is sufficiently recognized that the defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim as stated in the judgment below.
At the time of the instant case, the victim and the lower court consistently stated in the investigative agency and the lower court’s trial that “the victim was living together by the Defendant, and the victim’s son’s son was flicked and slicked. The victim 4,5 male and slicked in the house where the victim got out of the Plaintiff’s slicking.” The victim slicked and slicked the victim’s right neck, and the victim slicked and slicked the victim’s right neck, and the victim slicked and slicked the victim’s slick while slicked the victim’s slick.”
B. The Defendant and the police officer sent out the 112 report that the victim was assaulted immediately after the instant case, and the Defendant and the police officer sent out the 112 report after the instant accident, and the police officer sent out the 2nd police officer instructed the victim to report later.
C. On the day of the instant case, the victim visited the Seoul Mapo Police Station at around 03:20 on the following day after receiving medical treatment by going to an emergency room at the medical college hub of the medical school of the household of this case.
The defendant is a grandchild at an investigative agency, the original instance, and the court of a trial.