If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the fine shall be 100.

On September 15, 2018, the Defendant driving a B ASEAN car on September 21, 2018, and led to the driving of the two-lanes in front of the 1119 Public Security Center located in the north-dong, Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu, along the two-lanes from the c apartment bank to the dunes four-lanes from the dunes of the two-lanes.

In this case, the driver has a duty of care to not exceed the central line by accurately manipulating the steering system, brakes and other devices of the motor vehicle, as it is installed with the center line and the center line of the yellow solid line as a part of the decline immediately after passing through the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant’s failure to accurately operate the steering system and steering gear, and initiating balc peds, due to the error of speeding the speed of the vehicle, led to the speed of the vehicle to continue the remaining speed peds over the speed of the speed, thereby making the said fald vehicle go beyond the center line, and thereby, received the front portion of the falc vehicle driven by the victim D (the age of 51) who was normally proceeding along his vehicle on the left-hand side at the opposite part of the Defendant’s running direction.

Ultimately, due to the above occupational negligence, the Defendant suffered injury, such as a serious injury to the victim D, the first left-hand cut cut, etc. in need of approximately 14 weeks of treatment, and the victim F (the 57 years of age) who is the passenger of the said cream vehicle, respectively, for about four weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. Internal residence or investigation report: “victim F telephone communications” and “victim D telephone communications”;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso of Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 2 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning criminal facts; Article 268 of the Criminal Act

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act dealing with the ordinary concurrence: the punishment prescribed for a crime against D with heavier victims.