특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is a person driving Csch Rexton car.
At around 01:50 on April 8, 201, the Defendant driven the said vehicle at the front of the drinking house “E” in the “E” in the front of the said vehicle, and went back to the screen, as long as the Defendant neglected to take care of the aftermath of the vehicle due to occupational negligence, the Defendant did not discover the victim F (53 years of age) who was going to get a taxi from the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle behind the said vehicle due to occupational negligence, and left back the vehicle without finding the victim F (53 years of age). The Defendant continued to go back the vehicle to the right side of the said vehicle, and continued to turn the victim to the road with the front side of the said vehicle.
As a result, the defendant suffered injuries, such as cage cage cages at the left-hand side, which require approximately six weeks of medical treatment, but immediately stopped and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.
2. The defendant and his defense counsel's defense counsel's assertion that the following facts were not true or F, and that the defendant and his defense counsel did not have any injury to the vehicle of this case (hereinafter referred to as the "vehicle of this case"). The defendant and his defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense
3. The evidence that there is a criminal fact in the printing criminal procedure is presented by the prosecutor. Even if the defendant's indictment is unreasonable and the defendant's indictment is false, it cannot be disadvantageous to the defendant, and criminal facts must be proven by the judge with high probability to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt (see Supreme Court Decision 91Do1385, Aug. 13, 1991). If there is no evidence to form a conviction to such an extent, the suspicion of guilt is between the defendant even if there is no evidence.
Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.
(See Supreme Court Decision 92Do327 delivered on March 23, 1993). The Defendant is the instant case in this Court.