beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.01.11 2016가단226322

유류분반환

Text

1. Each of the plaintiffs' claims is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

The plaintiffs' assertion and the defendant are children of the network E.

The deceased E sold the sale price of KRW 118 million in the purchase price, which is owned by Sejong Special Self-Governing City (hereinafter “instant land”), and donated the purchase price to the Defendant.

Since the above donation to the defendant of the deceased E infringes on the plaintiffs' legal reserve of inheritance, the defendant is obligated to pay each of the plaintiffs' legal reserve of inheritance amounting to KRW 7,375,00 and delay damages.

Judgment

In addition to the purport of the entire argument in the statement in Evidence A Nos. 1 through 4 (including the number of partial headings), the deceased on December 15, 2015, and the fact that the deceased on December 15, 2015 was recognized as the fact that the deceased on the part of G, H, Defendant I, I, Plaintiff A, B, J, and Plaintiff C were in existence, and that the deceased on the part of the deceased on June 2009 sold the land of this case, but it is insufficient to recognize that the deceased on the sole basis of the above recognition alone donated the Defendant with the amount equivalent to the purchase price of the land of this case before his birth, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the plaintiffs' assertion based on this premise is without merit to examine further.

In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.