업무방해등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, from around 11:00 on December 19, 2013 to 11:20 on the same day, f.m. fighting with F and F.m. on the ground that F had been carrying out another female in the public announcement room where the Defendant resides in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, on the ground that F.m. was in progress within the public announcement room of the Defendant’s residence without permission, and that the victim avoided it, “I could be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be d
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's job placement service by force.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of witness D;
1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of investigative reports (as to the suspected facts of interfering with the suspect's business), transfer of the case of assault related to interference with the suspect's business, and written opinion of assault related to interference with the
1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;
1. The portion not guilty of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the detention in a workhouse;
1. The Defendant was dissatisfied with the fact that he was employed through E operated by the victim D (the age of 64) in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government but did not receive wages.
On December 17, 2013, from around 16:00 to 18:53 of the same day, the Defendant sent a voice message, “I am am am am am am am am am am am am am ambling,” and “I am am am ambling, I am am am ambling, I am am am ambling, I am am am ambling, and I am am am am ambling, I am am am am ambling,” thereby threatening the victim’s life or body.
2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, namely, ① the victim threatened himself.