However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 2, 2014, at around 19:16, the Defendant: (a) took a bath for the victim’s Ebscam to the victim, who was called the victim’s left-hand bucks, and called the victim’s scam, on the ground that F of the victim’s Ebscam, sent out after being reported 112 due to his failure, went out of Schlage; and (b) obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the notification processing of the victim’s 112 report by assaulting the victim’s left-hand bucks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (as to the field entry situation);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the accused who does not have a criminal record repents his error in depth and deposits one million won in the future in order to recover from damage);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;