When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 3, 2019, from around 22:00 to around 02:00 of the following day, the Defendant believed that the Defendant would be able to receive the fee even without any intention or ability to pay the drinking value to the victim D (n, 41 years of age) who is an owner of business within the “C” entertainment drinking house located in Jeong-si B, Jung-si, and that the Defendant would be able to receive the said fee. From around 60 Madju’s disease equivalent to the market price of KRW 450,000, and the amount equivalent to KRW 630,000,000, such as service fee of female employees equivalent to KRW 180,000, the Defendant acquired the pecuniary benefit equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing a receipt for the price of alcoholic beverage;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides for the following factors: (a) the amount of damage caused by the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order; (b) the amount of damage has not been reimbursed; and (c) the records of the same kind of crime (a) shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million on November 30, 2012).