If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the CA code car.

On April 2, 2017, around 12:10 on April 2, 2017, the Defendant continued to cross-section a two-lane line of the 2nd line in front of Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, through the Sungwon apartment, and was stopped before the LG window of the said road.

A person engaging in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to enter the lane that permits a U.S.ton and to make a U.S. internship at the U.S. branch in accordance with the U.S. Credit.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got the Defendant’s passenger vehicle adjacent to the Defendant’s passenger vehicle in front of the FOtoba, which was driven by the victim E (24 tax) who was driving the two lanes of the two lanes of the above road, where the Defendant intruded the median line on the two lanes of the two lanes of the above road, instead of allowing the UO to live well.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim, such as the closure of the left-hand slid, which requires about 10 weeks of treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the traffic accident report (1) (2) (the actual survey report), virtual vehicles and photographs at the scene of the accident, and medical certificates;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2) and Article 3(2)2 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the accident of this case occurred by gross negligence committed by the defendant who was injured by the central line, that the victim was injured by the accident of this case, and that it did not reach an agreement with the victim, etc. Taking into account unfavorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the facts constituting the crime of this case, and against the mistake, that the defendant deposited KRW 2 million for the recovery of damage to the victim, and that the defendant deposited the money