However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 12, 2018, at around 06:0, the Defendant got assaulted by the Defendant at the end of the second street, 142 cent-ro, 63 p.m., Busan Suwon-gu, U.S., 2018, on the ground that, upon receiving 112 reports from the Defendant, a police officer belonging to the Busan Southern Police Station B police station B of Busan, sought explanation of the procedure of the instant case from a slope C, a police officer, who was called, called the Defendant, “in the case of a police officer, a police officer, who is not a bitch bitch bitch bit.”

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the police officer as above and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution [Scope of Recommendation] The sentence of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that there is no (6 months to 1 year and 6 months) in the basic area (limited to June to 1 year) [the person subject to special sentencing] [the person subject to a sentence] [the person subject to a sentence] assaulting a police officer who performs legitimate public duties, taking into account the fact that the police officer has committed an assaulting him/her, and that he/she has a history of being punished by a fine for the same kind of crime, but the person shall be selected by