beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원강릉지원 2016.05.24 2015가합246

부당이득금

Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A, B, C, D, F, and G jointly do so and as from July 11, 2012, Defendant A, C, D, F, and G jointly do so.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendants committed the Defendants’ act 1) pretended to purchase apartment units No. 1212 and No. 804, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Hawon-gu, Hawon-gu, Hawon-gu, Hawon-gu, Hawon-gu, Hawon-si, Hawon-gu, Hawon-gu, Hawon-gu, Hawon-gu, Hawon-gu, Hawon-gu, Ha-do, and Ha-do, with a view to acquiring the loan from the bank as an Internet bank by taking advantage of the loan balance (or collateral security (or collateral security loan repayment) before the deposit of the loan balance with SK (or mortgage loan repayment) as an Internet bank. 2) Defendant D introduced the Plaintiff to Defendant E and Eul through J, who was the nominal owner of the loan, as a loan bank.

3) In addition, on June 2012, Defendant G suggested that Defendant G would sell only the name of apartment purchaser and offer 30 million won in return for the request for Internet banking in the middle. 4) Defendant G would accept the above proposal and submit an application for the above document, including a copy of the sales contract, the loan of Defendant A’s resident registration certificate, the resident registration certificate, and the payment record of the above apartment, as Defendant G would normally purchase the apartment in the name of Defendant B in the first place on July 2012, 2012, as Defendant G would normally purchase the apartment in the name of Defendant B in the name of Defendant G. The apartment would be issued to K employee in charge of the Plaintiff as Defendant G’s apartment. Since the apartment purchase fund falls short of the apartment purchase fund, the apartment loan would be set up on the collateral of the above apartment. Defendant G would have to pay back the existing , 30 million won in return for the Internet banking loan.

around that time, Defendant A applied for Internet banking (one hundred million won, one day, five hundred million won per day) at the Saemaul Bank which was in force on 47-gil, Seogu, Daegu-ro 47-ro, pursuant to Defendant G’s instruction and applied for the Internet banking (one hundred million won per time, five hundred million won per day).