beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.05.31 2016고단1321

사기

Text

A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than four months and by imprisonment for not more than two months with prison labor for a crime set forth in the judgment of the defendant.

(b).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, on January 27, 2012, sentenced the Defendant to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. in the support of the Suwon Friwon, the Suwon Friwon, and on July 12, 2012, the said judgment became final and conclusive.

[Criminal facts]

1. On April 5, 2008, the Defendant would reduce the amount of taxes to 20 million won from D real estate located in Gwangju City, Gwangju City F and G2.

Along with the transfer of reduced tax and resident tax, KRW 18,214,020,020, which is paid to B's account, was false.

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party, he did not have any intention or ability to reduce taxes or pay taxes on behalf of the injured party.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and is therefore subject to tax payment from the victim, 5 million won via the Agricultural Cooperative Account (Account Number: H) in the name of the defendant on June 4, 2008, and the same year.

6.5. Receipt of the remittance of KRW 13,214,020 in the above account, each of which was 18,214,020 in total;

"2016 Highest 3869"

2. On April 18, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim I that, within the scope of a hambured ham, near the camping tower in the area of the party branch in Sung-nam-si, the Defendant would also transfer the saves construction work on the saves in the area of the party branch in Sung-nam-si, to the victim I, who lent the 8 million won performance deposit to the saves construction work on the saves, if the saves were leased to the saves construction work on the saves.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not order the construction of a brue of the J-J forest in the Suwon-si District, and not only did the monthly income reaches KRW 800,000,000 without any particular property, so even if the Defendant borrowed KRW 8 million from the injured party, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to have the injured party perform the brue construction, and there was no intention or ability to pay the borrowed amount until May 25, 2016.

As such, the Defendant deceivings the victim, and immediately from the damaged person, eight million won is the name of the borrowed money.