A. The sentence of the lower court (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. We examine the judgment, and the fact that the defendant recognized, reflected, and did not repeat the crime of this case is favorable to the defendant.

However, the crime of this case is highly likely to be abused as a means of other crimes as well as undermining the stability and reliability of electronic financial transactions. In fact, there is a need to punish the defendant as well as undermining the stability and reliability of electronic financial transactions. The fact that the access media that the defendant acquired appears to have been used in the illegal Internet gambling site operation, the criminal proceeds acquired by the defendant are also an important role among accomplices, and the criminal proceeds are not small, compared to the original judgment, and there is no particular change in sentencing conditions, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, etc., the court below's punishment is too heavy or it is not deemed unfair, therefore, each of the above arguments by the defendant and the

3. In conclusion, since each appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.