If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On June 22, 2014, around 10:50, the Defendant: (a) heard from the victim D, the business owner of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, seeking to purchase salt using a credit card; and (b) from that point of view, i.e., “the credit card should not be available;” and (c) from that point of time, i.e., “the victim would not engage in normal business for about one hour,” despite the victim’s free payment of salt; (d) continues to run cry and salt; and (e) the victim’s demand that “the victim’s refusal” as stated in the facts charged of the denial of the victim’s right to defense is recognized by evidence; and (e) there is no concern that the victim’s actual disadvantage might be caused to the Defendant’s exercise of his/her right to defense; and (e) said, the Defendant expressed his/her voice by talking the victim, i.e., “old and old,” and made the victim unable the victim to engage in normal business for about one hour.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the statutes governing the arrest of flagrant offenders;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;