A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and for a defendant B, for eight months, respectively.

Defendant

A Evidence seized from A.

Defendant

A is sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act at the Ulsan District Court on July 3, 2015, and on December 30, 2015, there are three different kinds of records other than those of which the execution of the sentence was completed at the Ulsan District Court on December 30, 2015.

The Defendants are joint owners of unauthorized Game Places with no trade name located in Ulsan Northern-gu E and 3 stories.

No one shall provide game water which has not been rated by a conference of game water grade members for use, and no one shall engage in business of exchanging or arranging exchange of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

From June 2016 to February 2, 2016, the Defendants installed 23 games in total, such as the above game room, 13 10,000, 100, and 10,000 won per 10,000 won per 10,000 won in the game in the case of the game for which an unspecified customer requests the refund of the game scores acquired by inserting cash in the above game machine and the game for which an unspecified customer requests the refund of the game scores acquired by using the game in the above game machine, the Defendants settled and exchanged the game scores at 10,000 won per 1,000.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to use game water that was not classified by the Game Water Management Committee as above and exchanged tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness F, G, H and I;

1. Photographs of a game room;

1. A copy of the mobile phone text content and the agreement on lease of water purifiers;

1. Seizure records;

1. Responses with the results of appraisal;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against J;

1. Each investigation report and internal investigation report;

1. Previous convictions: The Defendants and the defense counsel’s arguments regarding criminal history and investigation reports (the date of release, etc.) were examined, and the Defendants and the defense counsel operated the game of this case by Defendant B. Defendant A is not the head of the game of this case.