난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
The reasons why the court of this case cited in the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the part concerning the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance. Therefore, the plaintiff did not submit the grounds for appeal, which states specific reasons for appeal, by the date of first pleading ( September 22, 2016) of this court.
When the pleading is concluded on the date of the first pleading, and the date of pronouncement is designated, the Plaintiff appointed an attorney on September 26, 2016, and the second date of pleading ( September 29, 2016) was opened upon the application by the attorney for resumption of pleading, but even until that time, the Plaintiff or the Plaintiff’s attorney did not submit the grounds of appeal stating the specific grounds of appeal.
On October 4, 2016, after the date of the second pleading, the pleading is concluded again, and the date of adjudication is designated, the Plaintiff’s attorney filed an appellate brief on October 4, 2016, but the grounds alleged by the Plaintiff in the appellate trial through the above appellate brief are the same as those alleged by the first instance court.
Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act shall be quoted as it is.
Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.