A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, for six months, for each of six months.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

[Presumption Facts] Defendant A operates “I”, a company specializing in real estate auction consulting and lien consultation. Defendant B, while serving as “J medical care center”, is in charge of managing the funds invested by K in connection with the auction of real estate to Defendant A. Defendant C is a company prone to Defendant B’s society. L Co., Ltd (hereinafter “L”) around August 2012, “N”, a main building of the 11th floor and the 11th floor of the ground, was sold by public auction but did not receive the construction cost, and the P Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “P”) and P Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “P”) jointly occupied the above N, and thus exercising the right of retention, and thus, Defendant C transferred the unpaid construction cost to the P Co., Ltd. as the owner and P Co., Ltd. 436,500,000 won upon request of the P Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “O”).

Defendant A received a claim for the construction cost equivalent to KRW 4.34 billion from Q, the actual representative of PO, around December 2012.

On December 3, 2014, as Defendant A was deprived of the possession that Defendant A properly exercised, Defendant A applied for the disposition of the place of interference with possession to the Incheon District Court on December 3, 2014, and received a written decision on the disposition of the place of interference with possession on July 21, 2015

Defendant

At around 14:00 on August 5, 2015, A and B attempted to enforce the above ruling in the manner of public notice and to occupy the above N. However, due to P employees, such as R, etc. claiming a lien and occupying the above N, it is a collective violence in cases where enforcement officers are forced to enforce the lien when they claim a lien in advance from the P and occupy it.