2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On January 14, 2003, the Defendant owned a building of 938 square meters, 42 square meters, and 49 square meters in Hadong-gun, Chungcheongnam-do prior to the subdivision. However, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to newly construct a building of 1,049 square meters in total (hereinafter “instant building site”) on the Plaintiff’s expense on a total of 1,049 square meters of the said three lots, and to calculate and settle the construction cost and site price (hereinafter “instant settlement agreement”).

(2) The Plaintiff and the Defendant: (a) the Plaintiff and the Defendant: (b) the instant building site consisting of 1,049 square meters and the aggregate of 1,000 square meters and 49 square meters; (c) on June 28, 2000, the said 1,000 square meters were divided into three large-scale 938 square meters and F-scale 62 square meters; (d) the double F was the part adjacent to the road, and (e) the Republic of Korea acquired ownership on October 22, 2002, with the acquisition of public land by consultation; and (e) it appears that the 62 square meters and 42 square meters prior to the division were included in the building site; (e) on January 14, 2003, the Plaintiff and the Defendant divided the said 1,000 square meters into 1,000 square meters and 49 square meters; and (e) on April 3, 2003, Defendant 204.

B. The instant building site was partitioned on January 14, 2003 as follows.

C. According to the instant settlement agreement, the Plaintiff and the Defendant acquired ownership of the instant building with the shares of 1/2, and completed the registration of ownership preservation as of April 3, 2003, and the same side centered on the central stairs of the building, the Plaintiff used and managed the instant building separately, and the west side was used and managed by the Defendant.

In addition, with respect to each divided land which is the site of the instant building, the divided ownership transfer registration was completed in the name of the Plaintiff with respect to the divided land of 447 square meters, and the remaining land was maintained in the name of the Defendant.

On the other hand, on October 19, 2006, with respect to the above C large 491 square meters, there was a combination of the E large 14 square meters, D 20 square meters, H 35 square meters, and I 42 square meters with respect to the said C large 491 square meters, and at the same time C large 602 square meters.

(e).