The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CKa car.

On November 8, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car at around 22:55, and led to the driving of the above car at about 70 km in the speed of 1579, depending on the volume of the deep-sea death of the wife population, on both sides, of which the distance of household life in 1579 was 157, on both sides, from the surface of the airside to the surface of the white-water.

At the time, the accident was done at night, which led to the flow of the front door, and therefore, the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by accurately manipulating the steering system and the brakes and safely operating them by looking at the front door and the left door.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not accurately operate the steering gear and the steering gear without accurately operating the steering gear and the steering gear, and by negligence, took the right side side of the victim D(33) crossing the road from the left side of the road into the right side as the front part of the above car, and had the victim go beyond the floor.

Ultimately, even though the above occupational negligence caused the death of the victim at the front of the oil station E in the wife population at Chicago-si on the same day, the Defendant immediately stopped and escaped without taking measures, such as aiding and abetting the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Verifying the occurrence of an accident while crossing a victim without permission;

1. A death certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing black booms CDs and field photographs;

1. Article 5-3 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Articles 5-3 (1) 1 and 268 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes concerning the crime;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (the fact that his mistake is pened) of the Act on Reduction and Exemption of Small Amount was that the Defendant did not have the same criminal history, voluntarily surrenders himself, and that the piracy vehicle has subscribed to a comprehensive insurance.