beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.08.14 2012고단4342 (1)

공문서변조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding 50 million won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

B, as the actual owner of the Defendant, who is a vehicle export company, operated the said company with C, D, and Dong business that invested money in the said company, and E, as the representative director of the Defendant, has served as the Dong and Dong and Dong in B and practical affairs.

B, C, D, and E restricted the export of vehicles from the office of the Defendant of Seo-gu Incheon in early March 2009, at the office of the Defendant of the Republic of Korea, from the domestic vehicle manufacturer company for a certain period after the release of vehicles, and the fact is that the Defendant purchased a new vehicle for the purpose of export without the intention to operate a siren business, but purchased a new vehicle for the purpose of a disguised corporation by establishing or taking over a disguised corporation for the purpose of a disguised corporation's name in order to disguise the purchase of a new vehicle for the purpose of a siren as if he purchased a new vehicle for the purpose of a siren, and then purchased a new vehicle for the purpose of a disguised corporation under the name of a disguised corporation and then purchased a false tax invoice as if the Defendant actually purchased it, and then exported the vehicle to obtain the value added tax, and the vehicle for

In collusion, “2012 Highest 4342” B, C, D, and E, from January 2009 to June 2010, the Defendant’s office located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, using a disguised cargo transportation corporation, siren corporation, and L, as if they were to have received no supply of goods or services, 140 won of false purchase tax invoice equivalent to KRW 4,720,150,00 in the name of the disguised corporation, as stated in the list of crimes (1), was issued under the name of the disguised corporation, and then submitted a false list of tax invoices by seller at the competent tax office, and subsequently, 434,03,450 won of value-added tax was unjustly refunded, corporate tax was unjustly deducted,138,286 won, and evaded taxes by fraud or other unlawful means.

Ultimately, the defendant is the defendant at the above date and place.