특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On August 19, 2002, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,00,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, on September 10, 2002, by the same court on September 10, 2002, a summary order of KRW 3 million as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, on September 9, 2009, by the same court on September 22, 2009, a summary order of KRW 2 million as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and by the same court on November 22, 2010, a summary order of KRW 4 million as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.
【Criminal Facts】
1. Around 19:50 on March 19, 2014, the Defendant driven a C Poter, a pro-friendly B, while under the influence of alcohol 0.146% of the blood alcohol concentration, without obtaining a driver’s license, from around the office of the “Korea Twalk Tro,” located in the Southern-si, Southern-si, 26-9, Seocheon-si to the river in front of the riverside oil station located in the Hancheon-si, Seocheon-si.
2. The defendant is a person engaged in driving a poter cargo vehicle provided for in paragraph (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Road Traffic Act.
On March 19, 2014, around 19:50, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle in front of the river station located in the Hancheon-si, Seocheon-si, and proceeded at a speed of about 40km in speed from the erost of the erost, along the two-lanes, to the erost of the erost-distance distance from the erost of the erost, along the two-lanes.
At the time, there is a place where a vehicle stops in the front direction of the road along a four-distance intersection. In such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by thoroughly operating the front direction and brake system.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, while driving under the influence of alcohol as described in paragraph (1), neglected to do so, and went to the victim D in front of the direction of the proceeding.