2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff is a company engaged in the manufacture and wholesale of synthetic resin film. From March 2013 to March 2013, the Plaintiff is a sludge/250 HF (the placement of actual containers; hereinafter “the placement of plastic posters”).

(2) On October 18, 2013 and November 11, 2013 of the same year, the Plaintiff returned goods produced by using the marina arrangement supplied by the Defendant to Samsung Twit Technology Support Team, and requested the content analysis of ingredients in the normal marina arrangement to Samsung Twit Technology Support Team, despite the fact that the content of the marina arrangement supplied on the above date is 50wt% (weight percentage), but the content of the post of the master is not fixed by 38.64wt to 38.64wt to 99.5%, and the content of the master is not included in the acid prevention scheme.

3) After that, on October 18, 2013 and November 11, 2013 of the same year, the Plaintiff revealed that, through the certificate of content issued by March 13, 2014, at the Mar. 18, 2013, there was a defect in accordance with the result of the request for the analysis of ingredients of Samsung C&T Customer Technology Support Team, and if the result of the request for the analysis of ingredients is not recognized, the Defendant directly viewed the component analysis and requested the return of the goods not used until then. 4) Accordingly, on May 23, 2014, the Defendant collected 300 km of the Muers not used until then to recognize the defect in the placement of the Muers (50 km and 250 km supplied on October 18, 2013) from the Plaintiff. < Amended by Act No. 11604, Nov. 11, 2013>

5. As above, if the Plaintiff did not raise any objection to the result of the request for the analysis of ingredients requested by the Plaintiff and recognized the Plaintiff’s dissatisfaction, the placement of a master is returned, and the placement of a master supplied by the Defendant to the Plaintiff.