2. The judgment is based on the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant led to the confession of each of the crimes of this case and stated that the defendant is divided, and that the defendant seems to support the elderly's father who is not healthy. However, the defendant can have the same power, and there are several criminal records that have been sentenced to a suspended sentence or a heavier punishment for the same and different crimes, until now, the damage has not been recovered completely until now, and the victims want to be punished by the defendant.

In light of the above circumstances and the fact that there is no change of circumstances that the original court’s punishment is to be changed in the trial, and that there is no other special reason to change the situation, the defendant’s age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, relationship to victims, motive, background, means and consequence of each of the crimes of this case, circumstances after the crime, criminal records, family relations, etc., the punishment imposed by the court below is reasonable and unreasonable. Thus, the defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.